As of Thursday, February 18, I am officially a licensed Loan Originator with the state of Arizona and NMLS (Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System).  Beginning July 1, 2010 all Loan Officer’s will be required to have a license to originate any loans.  This is an exciting and necessary step for the mortgage industry!  Here is my mortgage license.

Gary Miljour Loan Originator license

I have known for years now by gauging how the financial markets are doing gives us great insight of what the mortgage business will be like for tomorrow.

Portfolio Manager Chuck Wennerlund did it again by providing the inside track of what is going out in the financial markets.  His Managing Director and owner of Fuller Assets Management Lawrence Fuller again breaks down the numbers for us again. 

January 2010 Market Review and February Outlook

We decided to depart from our typical format this month to address the President directly in an effort to shed light on what we believe to be the greatest risk facing our country and our financial markets through the remainder of his first term in office. The Dow Jones Industrials (-3.5%), Standard & Poor’s 500 (-3.7%) and Nasdaq Composite (-5.4%) all finished lower for the month. Healthcare led sector performance with a gain of less than 1%, while the telecom sector was the worst performer, posting a loss of more than 9%.

Dear Mr. President,

It was with sound reason and centrist views as a candidate that independent voters accepted you as a viable alternative to the status quo. Yet in recent months your policy agenda has taken a sharp left hand turn off the road we believe leads to a sustainable economic recovery—a road that divides the two opposing and dysfunctional ideologies that plague Congress. Voters in Massachusetts made this abundantly clear following a special election last month in what could be interpreted as a demand that you reprioritize your agenda. Your response has been to push a more populist message that Democrats hope to be politically advantageous come November, but we view this as imprudent. The Dow Jones Industrials (-3.5%), Standard & Poor’s 500 (-3.7%) and Nasdaq Composite (-5.4%) all finished lower for the month. Healthcare led sector performance with a gain of less than 1%, while the telecom sector was the worst performer, posting a loss of more than 9%.

We endorsed your $787 billion stimulus plan last February under the auspice that it would be focused on the investments necessary to transform our economy and lead to economic growth that created jobs. What we have seen up to this point is predominately transfer payments, entitlement spending and tax benefits intended to induce consumption based growth. According to your website (recovery.gov), only $58 billion of the $275 billion in stimulus funds set aside for the grants, loans and contracts that create jobs have been paid out. Could this be one reason that the public is frustrated?

Your healthcare reform efforts, while well intentioned, did not succeed because you chose to focus on coverage before addressing cost containment. Forcing insurance companies to provide coverage for all and reducing government reimbursement rates would lead healthcare providers to negotiate higher rates with managed care companies. The higher rates would then be passed on to the insured in the form of higher premiums. The uncertainty surrounding such significant changes is more than Americans are willing to accept during difficult economic times. Our greater concern should be how we can continue to pay costs that are rising at more than double the rate of inflation. We believe that some states, facing bankruptcy, may have no choice but to no longer participate in the Medicaid program.

Your Administration’s response to the growing frustration over the economy has been to enflame the public’s outrage over the bailout on Wall Street. Meaningful financial reform that will prevent a future crisis has little to do with dictating salaries and bonuses or imposing a tax on bank liabilities to recoup losses from the bailout. Perhaps it is simply good politics, but it wreaks a hypocrisy that further undermines the public’s trust of government and thwarts the potential for progress. It is more than disingenuous to question compensation practices after approving $6 million pay packages for the CEOs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac this year and last, especially when the Congressional Budget Office estimates the total cost to taxpayers for the government takeover of both companies will be $389 billion. Proposing the largest banks pay a fee to cover the projected $68 billion loss likely to result from bailing out AIG and the auto industry is equally as glib when they have all repaid the loans they were forced to take with interest.

It would behoove you to recognize that we require as robust a recovery on Wall Street now as we hope to see on Main Street in the near future in order to maintain the high levels of economic growth needed to avert the looming fiscal crisis that lies ahead. Our $14+ trillion economy is saddled with more than $12 trillion in national debt. Your 2010 budget proposal totaling $3.8 trillion, which is expected to approximate 25% of GDP, has been exalted by your handlers as similar to President Reagan’s 1983 budget, which followed a recession and his first year in office. That budge totaled nearly 24% of GDP. The critical difference is that the national debt stood at less than 40% of GDP, and not the 85% we grant that you inherited today. We spent more on interest payments last year ($200 billion) than it cost to finance the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in what was a historically low interest rate environment.

Based on Congressional Budget Office projections for the deficit over the next three years, even if we assume a 5% nominal rate of economic growth (GDP) and no increase in interest payments, the debt-to-GDP ratio will approach 100%. Economic growth has historically slowed dramatically in developed economies when this ratio exceeds 90%. Slower rates of growth result in a decline in tax revenue that further increases the deficit. Rising debt levels inevitably result in higher borrowing costs as creditors demand to be compensated for the additional risk. You can be sure that Republicans in Congress will continue to push for tax cuts, while Democrats insist on more spending initiatives, but since both are delusional, neither will materially reduce the deficit until a new crisis unfolds. Ultimately, you must use your powers of persuasion to raise taxes, reduce spending and embrace pro-growth policies that expand GDP in order to avert another financial crisis that would undermine your Presidency.

At the present time, we perceive there to be more risk to the bond market than in the stock market given the potential for a substantial increase in interest rates. We have noted our concern regarding individual investors piling into bond funds at what we believe is the bottom of the interest rate cycle, but the latest investment strategy to surface in the world of pension funds is a far better contrarian indicator. The State of Wisconsin Investment Board, which manages $78 billion, recently approved the adoption of a strategy to leverage their safest investments (government and investment grade bonds) in an effort to boost returns in lieu of investing in risky stocks following a decade of negative returns.

We believe the correction in stock prices last month (6% from recent highs) was in reaction to the more severe declines we have seen in developing markets. Australia has already raised interest rates three times in the past three months. China and India have both raised short-term rates and reserve requirement for their banking systems. They are tightening monetary policy to reign in the rise in inflation that naturally follows unprecedented economic stimulus. As the engines of global growth, it is not surprising to see investors pull risk off the table, but it is too early to tell whether these countries, led by China, will be able to contain inflation without stymieing economic growth. For the moment, the uptrend in equities markets has not been interrupted and we view this pullback as a consolidation of recent gains until we breach the previous lows on the S&P 500.

Attention all real estate investors and buyers trying to buy homes from real estate flippers:

Most mortgage lenders now have strict guidelines when it comes to title seasoning.  Title seasoning is determined based on how long the seller has been in title to the current property.  If a seller has been on the title of the property for a very short period of time and now is trying to re-sell the property, banks will require the home to be title seasoned. 

A lot of people ask why a bank would care.  Well let me try and answer that question.  The mortgage lender cares because not enough time has passed to truly verify that the home value is holding, declining or appreciating.  Mortgage lenders today do not want to take the risk of the unknown so they feel that title seasoning helps protect them from this risk.  Now if you agree or disagree with the mortgage lender, that is not going to change the fact that they are now requiring this as a condition.  

Here are some good indicators with mortgage seasoning:

1.  FHA loans do require a 90 day title seasoning.  A purchase contract cannot be written until the title is seasoned beyond the 91st day.  Day 92 is the best time to execute the new contract. 

Click here to read the rest of my post.

I wanted to let everyone know about my recent and exciting move to Sunstreet Mortgage, LLC.   I will still be your Southwest Mortgage Advisor and can help you with any of your mortgage needs and questions.  I am thrilled with the new opportunity at Sunstreet and am looking forward to the new year!  Here is my new information:

Email: gmiljour@sunstreetmortgage.com

Office: 480.775.3682

Fax: 480.248.3206

Cell: 480.251.0002

4500 S. Lakeshore Dr. Suite 342 (Southwest Business Center)

Tempe, AZ 85283

The new cliché in the mortgage industry is that “We are getting back to basics.”

I have heard this phrase thrown around lately, but sometimes I wonder if anyone except other lenders knows what we are talking about?

I have a theory that if you get 2 or more mortgage lenders in a room at a party and they start talking shop, others watching probably think we are speaking Klingon, or what I been calling for a long time “mortgagese.”  You see, we like to throw a lot of words and acronyms around like FICO, DTI, LTV, flipping, deals, etc.  But I think we sometimes forget that Joe homeowner or maybe even most Real Estate Professionals have no idea what we are talking about.  So in plain old English, let me share what I know about getting back to the basics with mortgage lending.

“Mortgage Lending Guidelines 101″

Cash is King:  The more funds liquid in bank deposits and retirement accounts the better.

Down payment is crucial:  The more funds you have for a down payment, the stronger the loan file becomes.

Credit trumps all cards:  Without a decent credit score, a mortgage lender cannot even give you lending options.

Weird deals are to be avoided at all costs:  95% of the time if the deal is a little off the wall, it won’t work.

You must have a job or income:  The income source must be verifiable, believable and well documented for usually 2 years.  No job, no loan…Sorry!

Equity in your existing home will have a huge impact on the new mortgage loan being approved:  Today you must either choose to sell your existing home or have some pretty good equity if you expect the bank to offset the debt with rents.  Also, it must actually be rented out!  You cannot just say “we plan to rent it out.”

Appraised value matters:  The home must appraise for your offer price or the lender will cut the maximum amount they are lending.

Chain of title is important:  I have run into this issue lately with short sale flipping companies.

Title seasoning is a big deal:  Most lenders have sources that can do this loan 1 day after transfer of title, but are limited to where the loan can be placed.  FHA has a 90 day anti-flipping policy.

Mortgage insurance companies prevail over the lenders guidelines:  If the loan is going conventional for whatever reason, the mortgage insurance companies have their own lending overlays.  It gets real fun when you are in a declining market value state.

 AND LASTLY,

Mortgage Rules Change Daily:  This one is the most crucial.  What your mortgage lender knew in the past means nothing today.  The good lenders study up on current mortgage guidelines sometimes daily or weekly.  Even then it is almost impossible to keep up with the ever changing mortgage guidelines.

Again, when we say “we are getting back to basics” it means that common sense underwriting will usually trump with a mortgage lender.  If you have cash in the bank for a down payment on a home with some left over cash called reserves, you have a great job for over 2 years and you have decent or better credit score; you should be able to get approved.  If you do not have those 3 items, then you might run into some challenges.  There are always exceptions to these basics, but in general, that is what a mortgage lender is looking for today in a borrower.

The $8,000 first time homebuyer tax credit of 2009 has been extended until April 30th, 2010.  By the deadline you must be in a written binding contract, but will have until July 1^st, 2010 to actually close on a home.  A first time homebuyer is someone who has not owned a home in the last three years.

 There are some changes to eligibility and limitations in this provision that were not part of the 2009 bill.   The maximum amount of the purchased home cannot exceed $800,000, where previously there was no max.  Also, the income levels have increased from $75,000 to $125,000 annual income for singles and from $150,000 to $225,000 for married couples. 

 The provision for the extension also included a $6,500 tax credit for current homebuyer’s purchasing a new home, that was not in the original bill.  This includes homebuyer’s who have lived in their home five consecutive years out of the last eight.  In purchasing a new home, the home does not need to cost more than the old house.  If you move from a high cost area to a lower cost area, you are still eligible.  Also, if you sold your home two years ago, and plan to buy a home between now and April 30^th  2010, you are eligible if you lived in that home for five consecutive years. 

 The changes made have opened the tax credit to a lot more individuals than before.  Take advantage of low home prices and this tax credit before it goes away for good!

Posted: 02 Nov 2009 08:19 AM PST

Lawrence Fuller, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager

The string of seven consecutive monthly gains in stock prices ended in October over concerns that the economic recovery is losing momentum, despite a report that the economy grew 3.5% last quarter, signifying that the recession is likely over. The Standard & Poor’s 500 (-1.9%) and Nasdaq Composite (-3.6%) both edged lower, while the Dow Jones Industrials finished the month unchanged. Energy led sector performance with a gain of 3.2%, while the financial sector was the worst performer, posting a loss of 6% (source:Bloomberg.com).

Concerns that the recovery had stalled emerged following reports that weekly unemployment claims increased, consumer spending in September declined for the first time in five months, and consumer confidence slid in October. These reports cast doubt on the sustainability of the recovery, which many believe to be mostly driven by government stimulus. Fueling the negative sentiment were fears that the end of the home-buyer tax credit in November will bring a halt to the improvements in home prices and sales. Cynics argue that when the government’s stimulus efforts run their course, the economy will slip back into recession. Yet at the same time the index of U. S. leading economic indicators rose in September for a sixth straight month.

The market correction underway, similar to the ones we saw in July and September, is a correction in confidence and not economic fundamentals. While a weekly figure for first-time unemployment claims did rise, the four-week moving average declined for an eighth consecutive week to the lowest level in nine months. The decline in consumer spending for September was due to the end of the cash-for-clunkers program. Consumer spending actually rose on a monthly basis when auto sales are excluded from this artificially inflated figure. In fact, the current level of chain-store sales are on pace to far exceed the National Retail Federation’s projection for a year-over-year decline in November and December. We expect Congress to approve an extension and expansion of the home-buyer tax credit this month that will further support home values and sales through April of next year.

We can’t deny investors’ concerns and the public’s dismay, given the short-sighted policies coming out of Washington and the politicization of the economic stimulus funds to date. The vast majority of the billions of dollars approved for investment sit idle. What’s the excuse? The original plan was to spend the funds over a two-year period. Why two years? It is no coincidence that the mid-term elections will be held approximately two years after the economic stimulus plan was enacted. Meanwhile, programs designed to induce consumption, like cash-for-clunkers and the home-buyer tax, credit simply steal future demand so as to create the illusion that the status quo is better than reality dictates. These misplaced priorities are clearly demonstrated by the Obama administration’s announcement to send $250 checks to social security recipients for a total of $13 billion, compared to the $3.4 billion made available for projects aimed at modernizing the nation’s power grid. The $250 checks may buy lots of $10 toys at Walmart come year-end, and even fewer votes for incumbents in next year’s mid-term elections, but they do little to support job growth or the long-term investments we need to stay competitive in the global economy. Give a social security recipient a check for $250 and you feed him for a week. Create a job and you feed a middle-class family for a lifetime.

The sustainability of this recovery and continuation of the bull market underway depends predominately on one thing – employment. We still find more reasons to be optimistic than pessimistic, because our focus is on what the jobs data will look like six months from now rather than on what it was last month. Ironically, the rise in consumer spending (ex-autos) that contributed to a 3.5% advance in GDP last quarter is not the driver of growth or employment upon which our bullish outlook is dependent. That driver has yet to materialize. This is a profits-led recovery. The surge in corporate profits over the past nine months is unprecedented for a recessionary period. Therefore we should be focusing on the inevitable revival of corporate spending that will lead to job growth. Companies reduced labor costs and consumers cut spending earlier this year well in excess of what the severity of the recession in economic activity would normally dictate. This is because practically everyone assumed the recession was really a depression.

As home prices have stabilized and financial markets have recovered, consumer net worth has increased nearly $5 trillion over the past year. It has now returned to a level relative to disposable income consistent with the historical average that predates the stock market and housing bubbles of the past decade. We know that a rise in consumer net worth leads consumer spending by approximately six months, which bodes well for sustaining current spending levels as we move forward. Furthermore, we believe that earlier this year the 90% of consumers who are still employed cut back on spending more than necessary for fear their net worth would continue to decline. The dissipation of their fear explains the incremental rise in spending (ex-autos) from depressed levels over recent months and runs counter to the argument that the increase was stimulus induced.

Under the same misconception, corporations reduced expenses and cut employment well in excess of the peak-to-trough decline in economic growth (3.7%) in preparation for what they thought might be a depression. As a result, productivity and profits have soared and capital spending is down to its lowest level as a percentage of GDP in decades. Corporate revenues inevitably rise when the economy begins to expand, forcing companies to increase spending on capital equipment and to hire more workers.

Temporary employment continues to improve and the rate of decline in unemployment claims now exceeds the pace set in the previous two recoveries (1991 and 2001). Manufacturing employment surveys and the Institute for Supply Management’s payroll indicators are all moving higher. The current trajectory of the data leads us to believe we will see job growth by year-end, but the unemployment rate will still exceed 10% in the near term. An unemployment rate of 10% isn’t much different than the current 9.8%, but there will be a psychological impact on the public and undoubtedly visions of pink slips for politicians come next November. Herein lies the silver lining.

The unemployment rate exceeded 10% just two months prior to the mid-term elections in 1982, and the Republicans suffered significant losses in the House and Senate. We believe a 10% unemployment rate today will force the Obama administration to surrender political gamesmanship and accelerate an initiative Democrats intended to use prior to next year’s mid-term elections – a new jobs tax credit for businesses. We believe this would garner overwhelming support from both sides of the aisle and serve to speed up the improvement in employment that is already underway.

Another significant driver of economic and employment growth in coming quarters has yet to unfold. Businesses have continued to reduce inventories despite the improvement in sales activity. While industrial production is increasing, it is not increasing at the rate of end demand, so inventory-to-sales ratios are still declining. Businesses will be forced to bring inventories in line with sales over the next several months, which should boost economic growth more than most expect, further improving employment.

The trend in leading indicators that measure economic health six months from now collectively point to an improvement in the coincident and lagging indicators (unemployment rate) that the media emphasizes and the general public relies on to make emotionally based investment decisions. We believe these leading indicators will peak during the second quarter of 2010, at which point we are likely to temper our bullish outlook. In other words, when the unemployment rate is finally beginning to fall from its peak, and weekly unemployment claims (leading indicator) have bottomed, the majority of investors will finally feel comfortable taking on risk. From that point moving forward, stock market gains are likely to be muted relative to the gains we will have seen over the previous year. Investors scoffed at the idea of investing in stocks last April as leading indicators began to rise month-over-month, but they are likely to be euphoric several months from now just as these indicators peak. We believe we are beginning the seventh-inning stretch of the historic rise in stocks prices that began in March, and though we expect the breadth of participation to narrow in coming months, our upside target for the S&P 500 remains 1200. When the facts change, so will our outlook.

Our bottom line is that the economy is on the mend. The equation that supports our bullish outlook is unprecedented levels of liquidity plus historically low interest rates combined with elevated skepticism equals higher asset prices. Investors still hold more than $3.5 trillion in money market funds, which is nearly twice the historical average relative to the value of the stock market. The Federal Reserve is highly unlikely to raise short-term interest rates until the unemployment rate begins to decline, which we believe won’t occur until next spring. We can’t think of a bull market more loathed by the investor public than the one that began in March. Investor sentiment remains extremely subdued as evidenced by the flow of funds into stock and bond mutual funds. While investors directed more than $200 billion into bond funds during the first eight months of the year, there has been a net flow of just $15 billion into stock funds. This is all the evidence we need to know that most investors have not subscribed to the recovery thesis. The market should find its footing once again in November, following what may be a 10% correction from the October highs, but we would view this as yet another buying opportunity as the market averages achieve new highs before year-end.

This newsletter is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its investment advisory/management services. All information presented in this newsletter is believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty (express or implied) is made or given by any person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein and no responsibility or liability is accepted for any such information or opinions. Information or opinions expressed may change without notice, and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any particular security. Any subsequent, direct communication by FAM with a prospective client shall be conducted by a representative that is either registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration in the state where the prospective client resides.

For additional information about FAM, including fees and services, send for our disclosure statement as set forth on Form ADV from FAM using contact information herein. Please read the disclosure statement carefully before you invest or send money.

I get calls time to time from clients about how to get their utilities turned on.  Even though this is basic for me, this is a challenge for a lot of us if we do not know the steps to make this happen. 

Let me share some tips when having your utilities turn on:

1.  Make sure you know a precise date of move in so you have service ready on the day of move in.  I cannot tell you how many clients forget to coordinate this and do not have utilites on move in day.

2.  Call the utility company at least 2 weeks prior to move in and find out how you will be approved for service.  Some companies require deposits for the services, or pull your credit for approval (this is a soft pull). 

3.  Some utility companys require the escrow number of your file before they will switch service.  You will need to talk with the escrow/settlement company and get this information upfront.

4.  Make sure the boxes are unlocked if they have to go out to the property and turn it on.  This is a rare case, but I have seen utilities not turned on due to this reason.

These are just a few tips that will help with your frustrations of having your power turned on.

Please join Cherry Creek Mortgage as we present Tom Ward of Majestic Consulting.  Tom has over 25 years of Real Estate Broker and Mortgage Co. owner experience.  Tom will address many top issues affecting your business in today’s challenging market.  The seminar is free, but seating is limited.  Here are the details:

When: October 7, 2009, 9:00 am- 2:30 pm, Continental breakfast at 8:30, lunch at noon

Where: Hilton Phoenix East/ Mesa, 1022 W. Holmes Avenue, Mesa, AZ 85210 Kachina AB Meeting Room

Call or email Gary Miljour at 480.214.2818 or GMiljour@ccmclending.com to reserve your space!