Battle of the Home Mortgage Products: FHA vs. Fannie Mae HomePath

  • admin
    Written by Gary Miljour 23 Comments
    Last Updated: August 12, 2009
    Recently I have had several inquiries about a number of special loan programs available.  The latest, attractive looking product in the market is the Fannie Mae HomePath loan.  Depending on your individual needs, this product could be the right fit.  However, compared to FHA, the HomePath loan does have some drawbacks.

    Here is a comparison of the two loan products:

    FHA:

    • Down payment requirement: 3.5% down payment minimum.
    • Requires financed upfront mortgage insurance premiums and monthly mortgage insurance premiums.
    • FHA appraisal conditions required.
    • No declining market conditions.
    • Interest rates are extremely competitive.
    • Minimum 620 credit scores with most investors.
    • Primary residences only, no 2nd homes or investors.
    • Financing available to FHA county loan limits.
    • Eligible properties: FHA approved condos, single family homes, planned unit developments and manufactured housing.
    • Seller concessions: 6% toward buyers closing costs and prepaid expenses.

    Fannie Mae HomePath:

    • Down payment requirement: 3% minimum on primary residences and 10% down minimum on 2nd homes and investment properties.
    • Does not require any mortgage insurance premiums.
    • No appraisal required, home must be Fannie Mae owned.
    • No declining market conditions.
    • Interest rates are less competitive.
    • Pricing of the loan is less competitive.
    • Minimum 660 credit score requirements.
    • Primary residences, 2nd home or investors are eligible.
    • Financing available to conforming loan limits.
    • Eligible properties: Fannie Mae approved condos, single family homes, planned unit developments.
    • Seller concessions: 6% for primary residences, 6% for 2nd homes and 2% for investors.

    As illustrated, both of these loan products have benefits and drawbacks. For a typical homeowner planning to buy a home for their primary residence, FHA is by far a superior product allowing lower costs of the loan and payments. However, if you are looking for a great investment loan alternative, the HomePath product is an excellent fit.

    The HomePath loan has much more flexibility with certain options, but could be challenging given the higher interest rates, cost of loans and minimum credit score requirements. These factors all depend on your specific financial needs.

    If you have specific questions and need further advice, please feel free to call or email me. Every situation can be different.

    Gary Miljour- Mortgage Lending for Tempe Arizona

    Proceed with Confidence

     

    Follow me: 

    Twitter     Facebook     LinkedIn     RSS Feed

    BK-0907366

    Sunstreet Mortgage, LLC NMLS#145171

    Gary Miljour Licensed Loan Originator NMLS#207208

     

23 Comments
  1. This is good information. My question is what would be an average interest rate for the Homepath mortgage? You had mentioned that it was higher.

    Thanks,
    Kris

  2. Kris,

    When I checked and compared it to FHA it was between 1.00% to 1.25% higher on the rate plus the closing costs were at least 1% higher.

  3. #3 Chrissy says:
    November 7, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Is the homepath renovation program available to investors? I was looking at homepath.com and it looks like only the regular homepath mortgage (without renovations)is available. I would like to purchase a second home, but the home I’m interested in shows only the logo for the renovation program and states only owner occupied.

  4. Chrissy,

    The homepath program is available for investors. It however is not a renovation loan program, they will not pay for renovations to be financed into the home. The down payment requirement for an investor is 10% down and they waive the mortgage insurance requirement. Also, if the home is being purchased as a 2nd home, it also requires 10% down.

  5. #5 Kelly Silva says:
    November 13, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    Hello,

    I have a question about the 6% seller concessions for HomePath properties.

    We are preparing to make an offer on a Fannie Mae property that is HomePath eligible. This will be our primary residence and we are first time homebuyers.

    Neither our buyer’s agent or loan officer is familiar with the program and both were surprised when I told them that I had read on various websites that I could request up to 6% toward closing costs.

    Is this fairly standard as a request? Does Fannie Mae usually agree to these? Does it depend on the property value/price? I’ve heard the $5000 amount thrown around and am wondering if that is the maximum amount? The offer I plan to make is $200,000 and the property needs no real work, so it won’t be a renovation loan.

    Thanks for any clarification you can provide!

    Sincerely,

    Kelly

  6. Kelly,

    Let me try to help with any clarification I can give.

    Both the Fannie Mae Home Path program and FHA both allow a seller to contribute 6% toward the buyers closing costs and pre-paid expenses. Depending on your market you can ask for closing costs to be negotiated into the offer in your contract. So in your case, since the purchase price is $200,000.00 you could ask for up to $12,000.00 for closing costs. Remember both the Fannie Mae Home Path program and FHA will allow this with their financing. Also, please note by my example in the post, that most of the time FHA will be the cheaper option for the home buyer if it is your primary residence. This is because the home path rate is not as competitive as FHA rates. You also asked further if asking for closing costs to be paid by seller/bank is a standard request. That really just depends on the situation. In our real estate market here in Phoenix it is very common for buyers to ask for closing costs to be paid for by the seller, but this can vary from market to market. Also, it also depends on other factors such as how long this home has been on the market and is the seller getting mutiple offers on the property. I have always found that a buyer can always ask, the worst thing is the seller rejects your offer. I would lean on your real estate agent for advice on this.

    If you have further questions, I will be available today at (480) 251-0002 for questions.

  7. Hi,

    My question is, can I buy a Fannie Mae property with FHA loan? I am interesting ina Fannie Mae property, however I am approved for a FHA loan. I am confused about it.

    In advance, Thank you for your time and your help.

  8. Mia,

    You can use FHA financing on a Fannie Mae property. Some of the Fannie Mae properties are also set up through Fannie Mae to use Homepath financing. Either one is acceptable.

    Thank you again for your comment.

  9. #9 Kimberly says:
    February 25, 2010 at 9:34 am

    Hello,
    We are first time buyers that have special circumstances. We only have enough for 3.5% for down. We are approved and are in the process of purchacing a Fannie Mae HomePath home. We are useing a NSP fund program that is giving us enough money in a 5 yr forgivable second to come up with an amount around 30% down (with our 3.5% added). We have a credit score of 811. So credit is not an issue. We would like to get the best deal. My loan officer is pushing the FHA, but Im not so sure the HomePath would’nt be better. We are limited on options due to a lot of loans not likeing forgivable silent seconds. If we are going to have all this $ in the home after 5 yrs (when the second -NSP money- forgives itself) we are going to have to refinance to get the 2nd insurance removed. We are thinking that if we refinance then we will owe all that $, and we will loose the great low rates we will have locked in. We are planning this home to be a ten year, and would like to not have to deal with anything like refinancing durring that time. What do you think? Is it still worth it to do the FHA? I’m affrid doing the FHA will cause us to loose money having to refinance in 5 years. Please help. We are in a position to bennifit our family greatly and I don’t want to mess it up.

  10. Kimberly,

    Normally I can answer someones question pretty straight forward, but in your case, it is hard to advise you on the best decision when I do not know really any of your specifics. Also it is common for silent 2nd mortgages to have issues with the 1st mortgage financed. If your current lender is trustworthy and not trying to steer you wrong, then I would take his advice. But again each borrower’s situation is very unique. I do want to make it clear that you do want to take advantage of the low rates. Who knows if 5 year or 10 years interest rates will ever be this cheap.

  11. #11 Tonya says:
    March 30, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    My mom and I are purchasing a HomePath home and we are currently going through the mortgage process. She lives 170 or so miles from the property, but plans to commute until she transfers to a closer office or retires. They are requesting that a LOX be prepared by her employer explaining how she will be able to handle her day-to-day duties while living 170 miles away and also they want her employer to provide them with a local employment address that is closer to the home. The second part isn’t going to happen since she plans on commuting. What is the best way to go about getting this requirement satisfied, and do you think it will be a dealbreaker? In this economy, jobs are pretty scarce and more people are probably commuting to work. I understand that they are probably afraid she is lying and will quit work after getting the loan, but we are having a hard time understanding exactly how to give them what they need.

  12. Dear Tonya,

    I have had this situation come up before and let me share what I know. Underwriters and investors are not understanding why your mother would travel 170 miles each way, which is about a 3 hour commute each way back and forth to work each day. So requiring a letter of explanation is a normal logical requirement. As a loan officer, I would also question this because it is not logical. An underwriter has no way or knowing if your mother is being truthful or not. All an underwriter can do is make a judgement call that your mother is being truthful about her situation based on the evidence presented. You also stated that she plans to commute until she transfers or retires, so an underwriter asking for a location of a employment address closer to her home for verification purposes is again normal and necessary. Now you state that the 2nd part isn’t going to happen, but without this an underwriter has no way of knowing if a closer office truly exists. Understand the underwriters point of view, your mother is asking the bank to believe that she is going to travel 170 miles each way to work. If they are going to believe this, they need some evidence to back up your mother’s claims. I think the best way to get this condition satisfied is to be honest and forthcoming with the bank. Provide them the information about the closer office, provide them the letter of explanation. I do feel that this would be a deal-breaker with just about any lender out there based on the way you are trying to structure the loan. Before I responded, I personally called my head underwriter and went over your situation. He stated that he usually can get the end investor to sign off on a file when the commute is less than 90 miles each way. Further than that, he states that the story starts to sound not believable even if it is. They are 100% afraid that she is lying and this is why they are making it difficult. If I did this loan for you, I would run into the same situation most likely. Now I pose the question of why your mother does not treat this as a 2nd home and put 10% down. That would be more believable to the underwriter to get the file approved. No one is calling your mother a liar, they are just trying to back up her claims with the evidence given. I wish you the best.

  13. #13 Diana says:
    April 16, 2010 at 8:38 pm

    I have been living in a rental unit with our younger children for almost a year in FL because they are in a special school here. My husband telecommutes most of the time, but he lives in NJ where his company is some of the time, and some of the time in FL with the rest of us. We were told by our mortgage broker that we were eligible for a Homepath mortgage as a second home with 10% down, even though I live here full time, because my income is from my husband’s company in NJ. We made an offer on a place with 10% down as instructed, and it came back with a counter offer saying we must “Accept the following terms and conditions” one of which is, “Buyer acknowledges the Buyer will occupy this property as the primary residence pursuant to Fannie Mae First Look Initiative.” We have searched their website, and it never uses the term “primary residence” when discussing Homepath and First Look (which is only for “owner occupied” exclusively for the first 15 days of mls listing). The property would be owner occupied. We do not plan to use it for investment. We only have 24 hours to respond. Can you give us any advice about answering the offer? Thank you.

  14. Dear Diana,

    I cannot give you advice on this, because this is not a finance issue, but a contract issue. You must discuss this with your real estate agent. Now let me try to share what I can to be helpful. I have never heard of the Fannie Mae First Look Initiative, so why the seller is countering your offer I am not sure. Now, you have the right as a buyer to make it clear to your agent that you need to go homepath and that is final. You and your husband have the right to choose your financing, this is not a seller choice, but your one, they (the seller) cannot force you to change your financing, now if they choose not to accept the offer, then shame on them. You also cannot agree to this Fannie Mae First Look because then you and your husband would be possibly be committing loan fraud for stating that you would be owner occupying the property, which cannot be backed up on your loan approval based on your husband’s telecommute issues. If I was in your situation, I would counter back that you must finance using homepath and that is final. If you do not get the home, then it was not meant to be, but at least you were being honest. If a seller is this ignorant that they know your finance options for you better than yourself and will not agree, then you need to let it go and find another property with a seller that is more willing to work with you. I see this type of behavior from seller/fannie mae all the time. You just need to hold your ground. Good Luck, I wish you the best.

  15. #15 Diana says:
    April 19, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    Thanks Gary. We decided to explain our circumstances and are now waiting for a reply. The property would be owner occupied but not considered our primary residence, but Homepath allows second homes with a higher down payment which we are offering. The First Look program excludes investors for the first 15 days to give owner occupants a chance to buy, but Fannie Mae’s literature never mentions “primary residence” (that term is only used in our counter offer). Their definition of investor does not apply to us, so we do not know if we are excluded. As you said, if it is meant to be it will happen.

  16. #16 Diana says:
    April 21, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Our offer was accepted today. Thanks for your help.

  17. Dear Diana,

    I am so glad to hear your offer got accepted. Holding your ground was the right thing to do and it worked out. Congratulations!

  18. #18 Ellie says:
    June 20, 2010 at 8:11 am

    Hi Gary,

    My husband and I made an offer on a Foreclosure. We are using a mortgage broker and were planning on using an FHA loan. We have enough funds to put down 10% if needed. The house needs some minor repairs (possibly septic, heating). The listing agent is pushing Homepath Renovation financing. Our agent seems to have no opinion. We’re not sure what’s best. Our credit scores are very good. The Homepath rate I was quoted is at least 1 point higher than the FHA. Can you advise why the listing agent is pushing this? They haven’t accepted our offer and we think it is due to this issue. We appreciate any insight you can provide. Thanks!

  19. Dear Ellie,

    Most real estate agents push a product based on simplicity of closing and not what could be the best for the client. Personally I would not take mortgage advice from a real estate professional, but get your advice from your mortgage broker. FHA does have a renovation loan as well called a FHA 203K loan. This might be a better option. Please understand that you are in control of your mortgage decision. It is not your real estate agent’s. Good luck, hope this information helps. Also dollar for dollar the FHA loan will be your cheaper option.

  20. #20 Ellie says:
    June 21, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    Thanks Gary,

    Our broker did advise of the 203K and that is what we were investigating. Thank you for your advice.

  21. You are Welcome. Good luck, and if you need my advice of assistance further, please do not hesitate to contact me again.

  22. #22 Amanda M says:
    August 20, 2010 at 11:26 am

    Can you please provide a rough estimate on how much higher HomePath interest rates are vs FHA vs Conventional? And are rates even higher if doing the renovation loan? Are we talking +/- 1.000%, or are they really hitting you hard with +/- 3.000%-4.000%++ ?
    Many thanks in advance,
    Amanda

  23. Rates are about 7/8% to 1% higher on the homepath product compared to an FHA loan for a primary residence. The costs equal out because you have to charge more upfront origination cost on homepath, but they do not have the built in upfront FHA insurance. I just analyzed a borrower yesterday going FHA putting the 3.5% down vs. homepath’s 3% and the FHA loan was a far superior product for the primary residence. Again I really like homepath, but it is a niche product based on certain criteria and situations.

Leave a Comment